Category Archives: Permaculture concepts

Western civilization need for permanence

Western culture is the only one having a universal currency equivalence. All other cultures create compartment where financial exchanges are forbidden between compartments. For example you may do commerce within the area of food exchange but cannot make a deal, an exchange, between food and a service of habitat construction if this latter  service belongs to another compartment.

In the western culture a currency value usually defines a human value and this universal equivalence may create a confusion in the way we weight the components of our environment. For example a 10 USD share of a car company will have the same value as the daily work of a child in a developing country. This perspective imposed by the universality of the currency dilute human values in a technocrat vision of the world which in the process lose it’s real semantic, replaced by the value of the mean (money) itself.

We could consider this financial mechanic to be the factor which jeopardise the development  of a real civilisation. And we may as well consider that the main issue in globalization is not really really the quantity and generalization of exchanges but the equivalence of currency between countries with different capabilities to maintain their own compartment stability. 

We may analyse further the concept of compartments and how it appears in our current democracies, what shape it takes.

What makes the link between finance and the  social realm is politics. A government will vote a budget which represents the importance we will give to a compartment. This amount for education, this amount for health, this one for public transport, etc. Without forbidding the financial exchanges between compartment it will at least allow a set of necessary compartments having each of them the necessary resources and mechanisms to survive and develop as a part of a civilised world.

The issue comes when successive governments associate different values to these different compartments over time with different budget creating instability and denying sometime the legitimacy of a compartment. For example if public (budget) funding is stopped for education it correspond to the destruction of a compartment as a protected area and financial value generated in another compartment (e.g. industry or Finance ) can put its hand on this compartment through private school education.

The only way to stabilize the protection of the essential compartments which make possible the development of a civilisation would be to define a minimal budget allocation at constitution level creating this way a stable structure for democratic  development. It would bring a framework and stability to the political and financial world. 

The constitution of Europe criticized now days as being a non political therefore simplistic federation based on currency  could be the perfect benchmark to initiate such minimal budget ruling for adherents and allow national and regional customization depending on the different cultures and aspirations. Europe would then become political in its essence and remain non directive for the national variations in short terms politics and economic development ,  and would finally represent an ideal for Europeans .

Ideias – a Permacultura contra a proletarização

designA proletarização acontece quando a ocupação de um artesão se torna parte do manual do usuário de uma máquina.

Dar significado às atividades humanas vai na direção oposta; simplificar e modularizar as funções da máquina de forma que possam ser usadas e mantidas pelo artesão.

Permacultura ajuda a criar esse processo, utilizando as ferramentas (biótica e abiótica) unitárias que permanecem  a construção de um ecossistema. A revolução 3D vai ajudar a ampliar o espectro tecnológico das ferramentas e funções que serão manuteníveis (em material e design) in situ.

A proletarização aconteceu particularmente durante a revolução industrial.

Ela acontece agora dentro das profissões qualificadas a traveis das normas tecnocráticas essencialmente definida em um papel de desempenho econômico et da evolução exponencial das tecnologias.

Tem proletarização quando o conhecimento é removido das mãos duma profissão e substituídas por processos automatizados ou normalizados. Por exemplo, quando um camponês é transformado em operário responsável pela aplicação de fertilizantes e pesticidas prescritos pela indústria agroquímica e tendo perdido todo o conhecimento biológico da terra e dos ecossistemas.

A capacidade a criar ou compreender, organizar e manter as ferramentas parece ser a única maneira de guardar o controle artesanato e agir como biólogo, arquiteto e designer de um ecossistema.

Biomimicry and Permaculture

Showing the intrication between Permaculture and Biomimicry requires some digging.

Permaculture is not solely a replication or an inspiration of, and from, natural functions, it is as well “using directly and intensively nature”, integrating the functions and cycles of nature in the processes of food and habitat production.

This usage is based on the respect of biodiversity, qualitatively and quantitatively.

This respect of biodiversity finds its foundation;

  • In Permaculture; as a wish to recognize the human genesis and biology as intrinsically related to nature. This way biodiversity becomes a constituent of human ethic. Permaculture is an eco-friendly interface between human and the environment. The ethic dimension requires here the dedication of an area (zone 5) to the development of an autonomous biome, not invaded by human domestication.
  • In Biomimicry; as considering nature an inspirational reservoir, a knowledge database of materials and functions and eventually a way to develop eco-friendly (here in the sens of economy and ecology) solutions. Biodiversity is a capital the corporate world should preserve. Biomimicry is (mainly) an eco-friendly  interface between corporations and the environment. In some cases, of course, non-profit applications may be developed.

If Biomimicry is the observation and replication of natural functions then Permaculture goes further and transform human into an element connected to natural cycles. Permaculture could be seen as a Biomimicry way to integrate back human into nature, together with its technological background.

To approach this subject in more technical terms we will need to divide Permaculture epistemology in its different dimensions;

  1. Design methodology of functions and landscape including spacial integration and scheduling of functions and resources
  2. Systemic approach as a framework for ecosystem observation, analysis, tuning and optimization
  3. Processes hybridization (integration of technical functions in biological cycles)

And see how the biomimicry perspective is related to these different domains of Permaculture.

1) Design methodology of functions and landscape including spacial integration and scheduling of functions and resources

Let’s differentiate

  • the design of a specific function
  • the design of a landscape (spacial integration of functions including earth shaping, fauna and flora)
  • the design of a process (scheduling functions and flows)

The design of a function is typically associated with the possible usage of biomimicry as would do an engineer wanting to create an efficient and eco-friendly mechanism. Here biomimicry applies fully and Permaculture literature reminds his students about the shapes of nature; lines, curves, structures, volumes, fractal and the inherent physical properties of the various geometrical forms.

To open the scope of the relationship with biomimicry;  a design should include the optimization of recycling. For example we may design an object based on the size, shape, life spam  and particularities of the materials found in the commerce, in landfills or in natural systems. E.g. The size of the roof I’ll do is a multiple or easily adjusted to the size of the roof sheet I may find available in order to have no waste. Here biomimicry methodology is kind of constrained to certain obligations that may not exist in the industrial world; some dimensions of nature properties (elimination of waste and recycling of resources) should be always part of the process of design inspiration.

The design of a landscape, meaning mainly the architecture of the ecosystem, with its  various biotic and abiotic elements, will respond to 3 factors; human logistic, flows of energy, nutrients and pollution, and the synergies between elements.

If human logistic requires optimization, the tracing of the routes will be done avoiding erosion and make a good usage of gravity in its design, the periodicity of attendance of the different functions will require zoning  (a way to simplify a “graph theory” mathematical problem in finding the shorter path in accessing the different activities) and finally access path to critical resources will have to be secured in the sense of having 0 down time (always available). Here biomimicry may help in the analysis of the notion of niche in various species, with various locomotion modes and the way priorities are given to different moving behaviors. Biomimicry can help as well in finding synergies for transportation. In this area we cannot prescribe how biomimicry can play a role and options are really open from landscape shape design to energy efficiency in transportation.

The Flow of energy, nutrients and pollution has a very organic dimension, system wise. The contribution of Biomimicry may come from direct analogies in the different elementary functions, meaning the optimization of each specific materialized flow (water,  wind, rain, dust, nutrients, noise, etc.) or it may provide some topological solution in a more global perspective, considering these flows as a circulatory problem within a complex organ. This dimension of Permaculture requires particular attention. Systemic approach plays inherently with the notion of “Russian dolls” and every ecosystem can be considered as an interrelated set of subsystems. For example the soil can be considered as a substrate including microorganisms and a complex food web or it maybe be considered as an organ, our planet organ, in charge of digestion and recycling, giving life to the fauna and flora on top of it. In this perspective Biomimicry may give clues to optimize the circulatory flow of nutrients, energy  and toxins inside an ecosystem as it would best fit in an organ.

Synergies between elements. Synergy and emergence could be compared to the egg and the chicken, who appeared first ? An emergence is a byproduct of a complex structure however it will create a synergy, meaning a productive event, only if having a supportive value in the initial realm (prior substrate giving birth to the emergence). A synergy is in itself an emergent relationship which will change the structure of a system in a richer level. Biomimicry capital could be compared to the sum of the successful genetic transformation where the link between an ecosystem seen as a substrate and the emergent functions from this system create a relationship increasing the inner structure quality of the initial ecosystem. If biomimicry applies in the most impacting way in the different ways to handle agroecology it is in this domain. Synergy is maybe the cornerstone linking Permaculture and Biomimicry. In Permaculture the emphasis is put on relationship between elements to create synergies, in biomimicry it includes with emphasis the notion of structure (which is actually the same thing considering the spatial juxtaposition of even or odd elements).

An illustration of biomimicry is the creation of a food forest. It replicates the forest structure, the best adapted to tropical climate, and includes in the fauna both productive trees (fruits, nuts, useful wood, …) and supportive trees for the ecosystem. Studies show that the choice of species (assuming enough biodiversity) is not determinant in the viability, carbon productivity and resilience of a forest when there is an equivalence in the variety of shapes. This capacity allow a certain degree of domestication and orientation of the forest toward food and habitat production. Here the replication does not encompass “a priory” the understanding of the mechanisms at work for each element but consider the forest structure as a productive system for human.

2) Systemic approach

Permaculture is an instantiation of agroecology using a customized systemic approach. It shares with Biomimicry a strong drive consisting in observing ecosystems (mainly single organisms) to identify determinant and positively impacting functions. From there the scope of types of analysis between the 2 disciplines may vary, Permaculture focusing on a systemic value addition and Biomimicry focusing on the determinant function reproduction. We may assume more correlations in the different set of tools used by both approaches in the future when Biomimicry will mature and complexify the scope for design of its platform.

3) The process design and hybridization.

Here again versatile Biomimicry includes in its scope any kind of spacial and scheduled series of events that may occur in nature. In both discipline it seems more difficult to understand processes than elementary functions. Most of the time applied Biomimicry will focus on determining the value addition of a limited process close to the function to avoid the replication of systemic complexity. Permaculture will empirically play with a set of elementary functions to create an hybrid platform where nature and technology are integrated. The process perspective is certainly the most uneasy (although normative) method of development Permaculture may explore in a farm development. The common denominator between the 2 disciplines is the identification of specific natural cycles and techniques to externalize certain steps (and make a technological function from them) to help managing an hybrid cycling. Permaculture will then focus on closing the loop, Biomimicry on replicating the externalized function.


From this analysis we may project the idea that in front of the profusion of nature creations Biomimicry will naturally use more and more systemic tools and integrate a cradle to cradle quality to its creations. We may assume as well that Permaculture will benefits from the technological pool of functions coming from Biomimicry to optimized its hybrid processes.

We may say that Biomimicry is consubstantial to Permaculture.

Permaculture concepts & advanced concepts

Permaculture is a methodology allowing the optimization of agroecology using a systemic approach and an extensive and shared knowledge database.

At operational level Permaculture perform a fusion of technical and biological functions into eco-friendly cycles in order to reduce energy consumption and capitalize on autonomous and resilient processes for food and habitat production.

It leverage synergies and system dynamism to settle the regeneration processes necessary to sustain productive ecosystems.

It encompass ethic in its methodology of development to help  human integration through diversity, integration, complexity and autonomy.

At physical level it applies both in rural and urban areas

It is an open and integrative platform welcoming any ancient or new sustainable technique, concept or design.

Permaculture gives a complete guideline for the farm setup; site choice, global design, development roadmap and ecosystem monitoring.

It increase biodiversity, yield and reduce human labor and external input

Permaculture is information intensive and has developed a world wide knowledge database (via internet) of fauna and flora, functions, interactions and processes, adapted to different contexts.

The objective of a Permaculture design is to transform the resources into a capital (permanence) and reduce the need for operational expenditures (entropic loss).

Permaculture encompasses social and economic aspects giving a large part to collaboration, resources sharing and local market integration.

Permaculture and the revolution of 3D printing

3D printing will impact our civilization the same way industrial revolution did. It represents the final digitization of products and services. If multi media business has been greatly impacted by the digitization and distribution of music and films, 3D printing will operate on every product we may imagine, not only music and film but QUASI EVERYTHING, and will impact every business related to goods production and goods distribution.

As a side effect 3D printing will empower sub-cultures and Permaculture is a target of choice in this revolution,

why ?

Because 3D printing is about the popularization via internet of complex design and Permaculture is eager to develop or integrate technologies into complex design. Its ecosystemic foundation prepares Permaculture to integrate functions developed for complex systems integration.

Permaculture subculture is already using internet and design sharing in the settlement of the various functions of the farm and if current functions are still basic because of economic constraints their evolution will tend to merge into a subtle and complex paradigm in order to become energy efficient, interactive, adapted to the connection with the complexity of life, locally customized and CHEAP.

Permies are proactively working on function design evolution and we can imagine that with design sharing will come open source collaboration for adding sub features and customized primitives to the functions.

Maybe the 2 most fertile areas in 3D printing usage by Permaculture are

– the necessity for recycling material or elements used in the printing. Modularity based 3D printing will ease re-use and repairs of functions and modules, disassembling and material recycling of elements. A paradigm already part of Permaculture principles.

– the collaborative dimension in the Permaculture world where we can imagine Permaculture cooperatives able to invest in professional/semi-industrial 3D printers able to handle all types of materials; metal, polymers with different textures and recycling capabilities, new materials with printed inner structure improving resistance and flexibility. If not at cooperative level the sharing will be done at digital level with a shared library of design easy to implement through local or regional companies.

By mastering every aspect of the closed loop performance, both in natural based mechanisms and industrial and integrated functions, thanks to the globalization of 3D design and the efficiency (energy wise and material wise) of 3D prints, Permaculture will challenge the big corporations (agro-industry) on their specific strength; economy of scale.

When 3D printing “Close the Loop”

Another extremely powerful drive toward green economy will come from 3D printer’s owners need to reduce the cost of material and use recyclable resins.

Some equipment allows now to recycle resins at home and re-inject them into the 3D printers;

For the one familiar with Cradle to Cradle (Closed Loop) this means that the Cradle to Cradle revolution could come from consumers and not from the industry. Once again the incentive is cost reduction, as smart design applies in the Cradle to Cradle paradigm to decrease recycle costs under new materials purchase prices.

In this video a recycling machine produce the resin filament used by 3D printers;

Not only 3D printing recycling process capability could remove waste issued from 3D printing but could as well trigger the transformation of existing plastic waste into plastic resources.

Some study even states that this type of recycling will be greener than conventional recycling. External resource : read more here . By only considering the reduction of material purchase and recycling transportation costs we may agree on this statement.

Permaculture and finance – OPEX / CAPEX

Permaculture projects have the specificity to focus their investments on CAPEX(CAPital EXpenditure) through landscape design and stacking functions setup.

A successful setup is the one reducing OPEX (OPerational EXpenses) to a minimum, including human resource (labor), commodities, energy and goods inputs. A rule can even be stated ; low environment footprint means low OPEX (in general), although low OPEX is not necessarily equal to low environment footprint since external costs are usually not taken into account.

It is to be noticed that investors use OPEX and CAPEX as Key Performance Indicators (comparisons are made inside the same business segment having their own financial constraints), in order to analyze the health of a company. A more than average OPEX means that a company spend more money than needed in operational costs which is not an healthy situation. In this perspective Permaculture is a very positive approach aiming to reduce operational costs.

Industrial agriculture, once removed the subsidies from the government can only rely on economy of scale and face the challenge of fossil fuel cost increase associated with OPEX increase, therefore an unhealthy situation, endangered as well by the soil inadequacy (compaction and logging) on the middle and long term.

A matter of margin

To provide with a synthetic figure; since industrial farming relies on intense petrol input the production costs are high and the sale margin is tight and will be more and more tight as oil cost increase (this factor is compensated by government subsidies and we may wonder how far and to which extend this will continue). Since the margins are weak the only way to survive is to produce in large volumes. The market segment witnesses a lot of acquisitions and the concentration of power in the hands of few. This model give little space for small business and new entrants.

On the other hand Permaculture by working with nature and letting nature produce on its own provide with low production costs meaning an important margin and the capacity to produce in little quantities as well as experimenting in diversity of production. Permaculture gives latitude to develop a customized set of products adapted both to local ecosystem specificity and local market demand.

CAPEX spreading

The financial challenge in the setup of a Permaculture farm is to handle the CAPEX investment in a way that it becomes affordable for low income entrepreneurs. This can be done by spreading the CAPEX over time so that initial benefits can be used to finance each next step. It implies that each new function of the infrastructure creates either a strong synergistic addition or generates financial income. The approach put emphasis on specific methodologies or perspectives;
– financial critical focus in Options and Decisions based design pathways
– focus on material and labor reuse analysis
– further analysis on maintenance reduction through identification within characteristics list of components analysis and autonomy capability in deduction from nature method of design
– many small investments (mainly labor) in random assembly for yield identification and generalization (genetic like evolution)
– low cost reverse engineering of non connected existing functions or non adapted elements of the existing infrastructure (reuse, genericity, adaptation)
– minimize each CAPEX investment by low cost orientated design implementation, recycling, investing in efficient tools and mainly using the power of nature resilience (e.g. ecosystem succession, flow recycling, animal management, … ).
– reuse of existing resources for diversification still keeping low operational costs and identifying value added services and products

Transition from OPEX based to CAPEX based agriculture

In this video, Gabe Brown, the speaker, comes from classical agriculture and has changed his agricultural model to become sustainable. One leitmotiv in this video is “our Operation” (OPEX) and give plenty of arguments on how nature provide with environmental services (soil ecosystem creating fertility mainly) to increase yield and reduce costs.

It means as well that in opposition with projects where the main investment is done during the first year this approach significantly upgrade its CAPEX during each main phase.

These recipes may support farms
– having a depleted land and poor income
– wishing for a transition from agro-toxic farming, prisoner from their existing mortgages and operational costs, to organic agriculture.

It would as well open a market where the initial investment is made mainly on having a large buffer of time for subsistence (food, logistic and taxes) and a smaller amount of money dedicated to buy (cheap and) depleted lands having potential and needing time for regeneration.


Culture and Monoculture in the perspective of Permaculture

Accepting and using biodiversity is one of the main drives in Permaculture. The idea in increasing the richness of an ecosystem is to diversify outputs and opportunities, use nature self monitoring and resilience and benefit from ecosystems services (water recycling, air purity, soil fertility, …).

Biodiversity applies at elements level inside an ecosystem but as well between ecosystems. An ecosystem can be divided in sub-ecosystems with different properties, elements and interactions. Valuing biodiversity means as well valuing the plurality of ecosystems.

The recognition of biodiversity as a necessity in Permaculture community is transposed in a higher level of consideration when it comes to culture and human exchanges. Then we talk about differences, specificity, integration, exchanges, synergies, creativity.

Monoculture is failing to deliver on the long term, showing its non sustainability by denying nature mechanisms. Sub products of monoculture are sterility, lack of taste, lack of nutrients, air, soil and water pollution, loss of agricultural knowledge, dependence on mortgage and subventions, etc… It uses scale economy, brute force (fossil fuel) and transform potential partners in competitors. Over time monoculture not only transform a land in desert but as well destroy the local socioeconomic landscape.

Let’s define a comparison in order to better understand the shift between culture and monoculture and use another systemic domain : social network.

Facebook is the typical example of monoculture as an ecosystem. You may argue that such an ecosystem is a cradle for creativity and diversity. It seems to me that it is the opposite. Many mechanisms are embedded there to repress freedom and creativity.

– Advertisement format people,
– Knowing that your data will be used for profits or to profile you, checking if you are edible for a certain job, create self censure,
– NSA spying on your private data with the benediction of Facebook distill political fear in what you say,
– Social censure push people to remain silent on what really matter for them and talk about their adorable cat or the horrible one from the neighbor,
– Multimedia Interconnection engage people to spend their time smiling and self photographing, showing how beautiful, happy and valuable friends they are.

Since Facebook is a profit company which does not really give a damn about the material they use to make its profit (meaning people) it creates many reactions in the public and some tentative to propose alternatives.

Here it seems that journalists talking about Facebook alternatives choose to ignore consciously the problem. The particularity of Facebook and its alternatives is not the design, the features, the response time, or the fact that 30 000 pioneers decided to use another Social Network since it is adds free, it is because it HAS TO BE THE ONLY ONE for ensuring a global connectivity.

The same apply with monoculture. The paradigm is then a variant, it is not exactly about high scale connectivity like in Facebook but high scale economy and logistic to get the benefits from Taylorism and produce cheap low quality products that people can afford.

So what would be the solution to move from Facebook monoculture to social network plurality ? The answer seems one-fold; an open source browser (e.g. Firefox) and specialized add-on, able to automatically interact with various social network platform at the same time. One photo shared on Facebook would then be uploaded automatically to google+ and other more attractive or specialized social network platform, ads free or with better design or functionality and based on specific community of interest. With time, people would choose more competitive platforms having no effort to make to exist in various place at the same time. In a second step, the browser could become the avatar repository (Face of the book) navigating in various social networks (Books of the faces).

In this case the way to get rid of monoculture is people empowerment by adding an intelligent layer inside the browsing capability.

Coming back to monoculture and Permaculture it seems to be the same. The only way to get rid of monoculture is farmer empowerment with a technology based on better design, an efficient toolbox and the addition of a monitoring layer in the form of the mechanisms of nature and biodiversity.